Consent that patients actually understand

Updated 2026-07-30

Suzanne StudingerSuzanne Studinger
eConsent — consent as a conversation

The signature is the least important part of consent.

Ask any surgeon: the consent form is often signed at the least suitable moment imaginable — in a corridor, on a clipboard, days of worry compressed into a few rushed minutes. The patient signs, but how much did they truly take in? Consent that is not understood protects nobody — not the patient, not the care team, not the institution.

We built our electronic consent module to give that moment the space it deserves.

At the patient's pace. The patient receives the information at home, before the stress of admission: what will happen, why, what the alternatives are, what the risks mean — in plain language. They can read it twice. They can ask questions. They can involve their family. The signature comes at the end of understanding, not instead of it.

With the care team in view. The team sees who has read what, who still has questions, who is ready — before the patient walks in. Fewer repeated explanations, no missing forms on the morning of surgery, and consultation time freed for the questions that matter.

Traceable from first word to signature. Every step — the information shown, the questions asked, the moment of signature — is recorded and can be reviewed later. Designed to support your documentation and compliance obligations, and to stand up to scrutiny years down the line.

A first step, not a leap. The consent module works on its own: a contained project with a clear scope, not a platform migration. And it is the natural first step toward the Patient Digital Twin — the same foundation, growing with you at your own pace.

Our first hospital deployment starts exactly this way.

Talk to us about consent in your institution →

Consent that patients actually understand | LLAAMA